Signing a petition for a fault to be corrected like the faulty AGC (Automatic Gain Control) with its top-end HISS, in the EOS 550D -- which can't be disabled -- is a very cap-in-hand way of telling Canon that they actually have a choice in the matter. If you purchased a new car with an exaust so noisy that the vehicle was lawfully unusable would you simply sign a petition--or tell the manufacturer to take the 'lemon' back and fix it?
It's not as if AGCs are a new problem. These things have been causing problems in video equipment since the 80s.
Yes, I have my own fix, which is to extract the audio in a video editor and run it through an old version of Cool Edit (V2) -- choosing Effects/Noise Reduction/Hiss Reduction/Standard Hiss Reduction. And you get most of it out (with some very slight 'breathing' after a period of silence just before the next passage of audio). But it's time wasting and isn't perfect and shouldn't be required in the first place. And it's an anachronism that 18-year-old software can fix a problem that the 2009/2010 Canon EOS 550D camera creates.
What is more ridiculous is that if Canon's audio guys (presuming they have such staff) were incapable of putting a decent AGC in the camera, and for reasons known only to them left out a 'disable' function, then they simply could have asked some first-year apprentice audio technician how to put a filter with a cut-off frequency on the damn thing.
I've written to Canon, but if they can't rectify the problem I'm taking the camera back as 'faulty' and asking for a refund. I'm not interested in third party hacks that void the warranty.