The third party lens makers like Tamron, Sigma, Tokina and others do not have the same quality control in the manufacturing process that Canon and Nikon do. Failures of that type are not at all uncommon. Another relatively unknown fact with third party glass is that image quality varies within the same model.
In the 1970's Vivitar lenses seemed to come in 3 "grades" within the same model. Pretty good, mediocre, and downright awful. In 1973 the photo lab chief and I hit the Navy Exchange in Taipei and the photo counter had a 20mm Vivitar wide angle in Nikon mount. He "snapped it up" while I hesitated, he began using it "on assigment", I was doing most of the "grunt" lab work and wound up printing most of his stuff.
Couple of months later they got another one in and this time I didn't hesitate. First thing that hit me in the face was that mine was much, much sharper than his. Same focal length, same lens formula, same lab Nikon F2...But mine was sharp and his was soft.
I saw the same thing in Vivitar Series One 70-210 zooms in that time period and I continue to see the same thing in the current third party lenses sold.
So in those days I stuck with Nikkors, now I stay with Canon (Olympus Zuiko and Panasonic Lumix in Micro Four Thirds) glass.