Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 25, 2013, 04:31:20 AM


Author Topic: Advice needed: macro filter  (Read 1066 times)

Offline ThatGirl

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2012, 04:04:35 PM »
Hi all,

Thankyou so much for your replies.

I ended up buying the macro set I initially posted about, but for a 52mm lens. Check out some of the shots on: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.358820090818721.87725.348961015137962&type=1

I think I can make do with this until I have saved up the £700 needed for my next lens!

Thanks again,
Shosh

Offline rpavich

  • Sr. Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 2072
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2012, 04:28:48 PM »
hey...I checked out your shots...they look nice and sharp! that's the ticket.

What f/stop did you use? Try to use the max (f22 or there abouts) to get max DOF.

Offline ThatGirl

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2012, 04:55:22 PM »
hey...I checked out your shots...they look nice and sharp! that's the ticket.

What f/stop did you use? Try to use the max (f22 or there abouts) to get max DOF.

Thanks!

I have others that I'll be uploading when I get a minute, I think I shot on a maximum of f5. Remember im a noooooob! Ive been shooting on manual settings all week and am FINALLY getting the hang of it, still darent go near f22 tho as I end up with white images!

Shosh

Offline rpavich

  • Sr. Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 2072
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2012, 05:03:24 PM »
Don't be afraid of f/22 lol

Just remember... as the f/ stop goes up... the shutter has to come down the same number of clicks. If you do that the exposure will be the same.

Offline snailtek

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 236
    • Experiment
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #19 on: April 13, 2012, 01:05:06 PM »
to add to your confusion hahaha

check what im using here. http://snailtek.blogspot.com/2012/03/fotodiox-canon-eos-macro-extension-tube.html
Canon T2i
Canon EF-S 18-55 & 55-250 kit lens
Canon 50mm 1.8
Sigma 10-20mm

Offline this2ismyname

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 246
  • It's all practice
    • Acorn Fabrication
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #20 on: April 29, 2012, 01:18:44 PM »
I'm also going to add some confusion: has anyone tried a reverse mount adapter (mounting the lens backward using the filter threads)? The one below would be for a kit lens.

http://www.amazon.com/Fotodiox-Filter-Reverse-Adapter-Digital/dp/B001G4PA36

Offline LeadinghamPhoto

  • Sr. Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 2244
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #21 on: April 29, 2012, 10:17:42 PM »
These make me nervous.  When you reverse the lens, you leave the contacts and that side lens open for damage.  You can't put a protective filter or lens hood on it.  So you have to be extra careful.
The poster formally known as Pineconetreehouse

Offline NightowlDVP

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 110
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #22 on: April 30, 2012, 12:17:12 AM »
These make me nervous.  When you reverse the lens, you leave the contacts and that side lens open for damage.  You can't put a protective filter or lens hood on it.  So you have to be extra careful.

I hear what ur sayin PineCone,
but really, when AREN'T we careful with our lens anyway? u know?

I think if ur nervous, then u're probably already careful enough! :)

Offline Skippy

  • Some people have a photographic memory but they have no film.
  • Admin
  • *
  • Posts: 6538
    • My Smugmug
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #23 on: April 30, 2012, 03:00:07 AM »
Buy it right the first time, or you'll end up buying it twice.

Which is cheaper? Buying the much better quality Lightcraft ND now, for 70 or so...

Or buying the Polaroid for 26 and then upgrading to the Lightcraft ND for another 70?

 ;)

Oh, and you should buy the biggest size filter you can afford... like getting a 67mm or 72mm fader instead of the 58mm. As you upgrade your lenses, you won't have to buy another filter if you get a lens that needs one bigger than 58mm, since 58mm is on the smaller side for filter sizes.  You can mount bigger filters on smaller lenses with step up rings, but you can't use a 58mm filter on a 67mm filter size lens.
Spot on right here. Saved me all the typing.
I'm an old film guy just playing catchup in this digital world. Help me out.

square root of 2:   f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, f/22, f/32, f/45, f/64, f/90, f/128

Camera simulator. http://www.kamerasimulator.se/eng/?page_id=2

Offline this2ismyname

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 246
  • It's all practice
    • Acorn Fabrication
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2012, 08:31:23 AM »
These make me nervous.  When you reverse the lens, you leave the contacts and that side lens open for damage.  You can't put a protective filter or lens hood on it.  So you have to be extra careful.

I was thinking if you bought an cheap old FD lens as a dedicated reversed lens you really wouldn't need to worry  too much about contacts or damaging it. I don't think a manual f-stop would work, but you could still sandwich filters in between.

Offline Doodle

  • Sr. Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 3824
  • Old age causes memory loss. Or worse, memory loss.
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2012, 05:49:25 PM »
Hey ThatGirl,
any relation to Marlo Thomas?

(let's see how many know the connection...)
Take your camera with you dammit. You can't take your next "best photo" if your camera is sitting at home in the bag, now can you?

Offline Skippy

  • Some people have a photographic memory but they have no film.
  • Admin
  • *
  • Posts: 6538
    • My Smugmug
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2012, 07:03:55 PM »
Hey ThatGirl,
any relation to Marlo Thomas?

(let's see how many know the connection...)
Not only do I know it, I thought it as soon as I saw here name. I was going to ask her age as that would give away if they are on our page or not. BTW, I think there is a new sort of show that is a modern twist of That Girl but for the life of me I can not think of the show. :( I caught the name and saw some of it and that is what it made me think of.
I'm an old film guy just playing catchup in this digital world. Help me out.

square root of 2:   f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, f/11, f/16, f/22, f/32, f/45, f/64, f/90, f/128

Camera simulator. http://www.kamerasimulator.se/eng/?page_id=2

Offline LeadinghamPhoto

  • Sr. Contributor
  • *
  • Posts: 2244
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2012, 07:17:51 PM »
These make me nervous.  When you reverse the lens, you leave the contacts and that side lens open for damage.  You can't put a protective filter or lens hood on it.  So you have to be extra careful.

I was thinking if you bought an cheap old FD lens as a dedicated reversed lens you really wouldn't need to worry  too much about contacts or damaging it. I don't think a manual f-stop would work, but you could still sandwich filters in between.
But, if you happen to damage the contacts or mount in anyway and happen to try to put on the camera correctly, you could end up damaging your camera.
The poster formally known as Pineconetreehouse

Offline snailtek

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 236
    • Experiment
Re: Advice needed: macro filter
« Reply #28 on: May 11, 2012, 11:49:45 AM »
there use to be a talk about Raynox DCR-250 here. try searching it.
Canon T2i
Canon EF-S 18-55 & 55-250 kit lens
Canon 50mm 1.8
Sigma 10-20mm